Mercurial > hg > mercurial-crew
view tests/test-pull-pull-corruption.t @ 21754:7e14d026c4c4
run-tests: fixes the '--interactive' option error
This patch fixes a regression recently introduced by a refactoring.
Previously when failure occurs while testing with '--interactive' was enable,
it didn't prompt user by asking whether he wants to accept this failure
changes or not.
This was happening beacuse of the 'if' condition
if ret or not self._options.interactive or \
not os.path.exists(test.errpath):
Everytime failure occurs, this condition gets true and returns back even
when '--interactive' is enabled. This condition don't led the function to
execute further, which consist the '--interactive' functionality.
Now, on failure with '--interactive' enabled, it prompts user whether he wants
to accepts failure changes or not.
If yes then test gets passed and returns true, else test gets failed.
On every failure, results gets stored in "self.failures.append((test, reason))"
But if failure changes accepted by user then test must get "pop out" from
failed test list.
| author | anuraggoel <anurag.dsps@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:45:23 +0530 |
| parents | f2719b387380 |
| children |
line wrap: on
line source
Corrupt an hg repo with two pulls. create one repo with a long history $ hg init source1 $ cd source1 $ touch foo $ hg add foo $ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; do > echo $i >> foo > hg ci -m $i > done $ cd .. create one repo with a shorter history $ hg clone -r 0 source1 source2 adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd source2 $ echo a >> foo $ hg ci -m a $ cd .. create a third repo to pull both other repos into it $ hg init corrupted $ cd corrupted use a hook to make the second pull start while the first one is still running $ echo '[hooks]' >> .hg/hgrc $ echo 'prechangegroup = sleep 5' >> .hg/hgrc start a pull... $ hg pull ../source1 > pull.out 2>&1 & ... and start another pull before the first one has finished $ sleep 1 $ hg pull ../source2 2>/dev/null pulling from ../source2 searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads) (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge) $ cat pull.out pulling from ../source1 requesting all changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 10 changesets with 10 changes to 1 files (run 'hg update' to get a working copy) see the result $ wait $ hg verify checking changesets checking manifests crosschecking files in changesets and manifests checking files 1 files, 11 changesets, 11 total revisions $ cd ..